head_cmtes.jpg (18774 bytes)
Sidelinks.jpg (16852 bytes)

WSTA HR Roundtable Meeting Minutes
Intercity Transit
June 1, 2007

Present:  Louisa Hernandez, Ben Franklin Transit; Sandie Barnhart, Clallam Transit; Tina Guzinski, Community Transit; Arlene Doern, C-TRAN; Sandi Free, C-TRAN; Christine DiRito, Intercity Transit; Dave Kapaun, Intercity Transit; Ed Ruttledge, Intercity Transit; Rachael Horsley, Intercity Transit; Susan Collins-Scott, Intercity Transit, Colleen McKimmie, Island Transit; Sybil Laners, Kitsap Transit; David Collier, Lane Transit; Mary Adams, Lane Transit; Pat Rather, Lane Transit; Lynn Bourton, Link Transit; Jenny Huff, Mason Transit; Carolyn LePage,  Mason Transit; Jean White, Pierce Transit; Mary Lozeau, Skagit Transit; Chris Baldini, Spokane Transit; Kimberly Somers, Whatcom Transit; Barb Savary, WSDOT; Wendi Hill, WSTA; and Tracey Christianson, WSTIP.      

Welcome & Introductions
Mike Harbour, General Manager; Ed Ruttledge, Intercity Transit HR Director; and Christine DiRito, HR Analyst, welcomed the attendees to the Intercity Transit facility in Olympia.

Intercity Transit’s Operator Communication & Policy Committee (OCPC)
Mike Harbour, Jim Merrill, Director of Operations; and Jacque Dennee-Lee, Operator explained the origins and the operation of the committee.  The committee was formed 13 years ago and is made up of 5 operators (who serve approx. 1 ½ years on the committee), the Operations Director, the General Manager, the Maintenance Director, and the Senior Planner.  The operators members are volunteers, and the final selection is made by a random drawing.  In addition to the regular members, guests are invited to come to meetings to discuss particular issues.  Frequent guests are the Dial-A-Lift Manager, and the Facilities Manager.  The committee meets weekly, which plays and important part in helping to keep communication flowing.

After an explanation of why the committee was formed (morale was low and grievances were high), Jim Merrill did caution that although the committee has been extremely successful, the OCPC is not a place to negotiate the union contract.  Jim did commented that the cost of the committee meetings is relatively high, because operators must be relieved from their shifts and paid to attend the meeting, and the relief operators must be paid as well.  In addition, other staff time/costs are involved.  However over the years, the value of the committee and what it has accomplished has been well worth the costs.

Jacque Dennee-Lee stated that operators now feel that they are heard, that “it levels the playing field” and alleviates the rumor mill.  The general consensus from management and employees is that the committee has dramatically reduced grievances by resolving issues before they become grievances, and has had a positive effect on morale.

Select Inc.’s Operator & Supervisor Testing & Assessment Tools
Geoff Rodgers, VP of Business Development was on hand to discuss Select’s testing and assessment tools.  Geoff said Select has been in business approximately 25 years, and has been involved with the transit industry for about 2 ½ years.

Geoff stated once employees are hired, if there is a problem with an employee, it usually deals with core issues such as values, attitudes, honesty, respect, motivation, ability to adapt, etc.  These types of issues are difficult to uncover during the typical interview and testing process.  According to Geoff, interviews are only 58% effective in making good hiring decisions and only 8% more effective than flipping a coin at 50%.  What you see during an interview is usually what the candidate wants you to see.  You are not able to uncover the person’s core values.

If a bad hiring decision is made, it’s expensive.  The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimates it costs 20 times an employee’s weekly salary if the employee has to be turned over.   Geoff says, “You can’t train your way out of a bad hiring decision.”

Select Inc. analyzes each job and develops assessments and tests by determining what core values are needed to be a top performer in that job.  The Select Assessment not only screens out people who are not a good fit for the job, but screens in people who are a good fit, and will enjoy the job.

For WSTIP members the cost of administering and scoring each test is $10 per test.  The test takes approximately 1 ¼ to 1 ½ hours to complete.  Concerns were raised by some HR Roundtable members regarding whether or not the test is fair for minority candidates, who speak English as a second language.  The test is written at a sixth grade reading level.  Currently the test is not available in any other language. 

A discussion period followed Geoff’s presentation.  Some HR Roundtable members who have used the test say they have had mixed results.  Many felt they needed more time to use the test before making a final determination/outcome.  Some members expressed interest in trying the Select assessment tools.  In order to help agencies evaluate whether or not to give the test, Geoff said he would provide free tests to interested agencies who want to test a limited number of current employees to see how they score.

NEOGOV Update from Community Transit
Tina Guzinski, from Community Transit gave a summary of her agency’s experiences with NEOGOV, the automated hiring and applicant tracking system tailored for public sector agencies.  Community has had the system in place approximately two years; it took about 90 days to implement it. 

NEOGOV provides the agency with the ability to accept on-line applications and tracks applications through the entire hiring process.  Community does not currently use all the features NEOGOV provides.  The agency is still learning more about the system and experimenting with some features.  NEOGOV is constantly changing and updating the system as well.  Once a quarter they offer updates in response to their customers’ requests.

Tina stated the most time consuming aspect of getting the system up and running was getting all the job descriptions on-line.  Community hired a temporary to data input all of their job descriptions.  Notification letters to applicants and interview questions (that can be accessed by the hiring department) are also in the data base.  When an applicant applies or inquires about a Community job they go to a website that looks exactly like the agency website, but it is actually the NEOGOV website.  The applicant can look at job descriptions and fill out a job interest card, so that if a position that interests them becomes open, they will automatically be notified by e-mail.

Community Transit is moving away from paper applications.  Some positions can be applied for only on-line, others (such as mechanics, operators, and vehicle service) may be applied for either on-line or by paper.  Paper applications are scanned into the system.  Letters of reference, etc. can also be scanned.  Community has set up kiosks in their lobby so applicants can apply on-line at the agency.  Community believes that the on-line application process also appeals to younger applicants. During the last six months 92.73% of all Community’s applications were on-line.

Screening of applications happens on-line, and then the screened applications are forwarded electronically to the hiring official.  The time it takes to screen applications has been reduced dramatically (Tina described it as “jaw dropping”).  Another advantage is an applicant cannot submit an incomplete application on-line; the system forces them to complete the application.  Recruiting costs can also be tracked by the system.  The system may be used for both internal and external recruitments.  The annual cost for the system is approximately $16,000.

Community appreciates the following aspects of NEOGOV:  having the job descriptions and salary on-line; the job interest cards; the auto scoring of the screening process; elimination of photo copying of applications (the hiring authority can view them on-line, or print them out as needed).  More advantages:  e-mail or mail merge notification to applicants of their status; each applicant gets an ID number so that a historical record can be kept on them as to which jobs they’ve applied for, and where they are in each process, when they were notified, etc.

Community has found some disadvantages to the system, they are:  the reports are cumbersome and difficult to read (too much information); up loading of resumes, etc. has been a problem; e-mail notifications are not “blind” (the e-mail state the sender’s name and e-mail address instead of just being sent from the agency, so disgruntled applicants often call the sender to complain if they were not selected).  Other problems include directions for agency users are confusing and sometimes out of date (however if you call NEOGOV directly they are very responsive) and training materials are not user friendly.  The auto scoring system is not intuitive, so if you don’t use it often, you may have to refresh your memory by looking things up again.

Intercity Transit’s Recent Arbitration Award
Ed Ruttledge (Intercity Transit) gave a brief presentation regarding a recent grievance arbitration award.  At issue was an employee dismissal.  The arbitrator not only returned the employee with full back pay and benefits, but also “chastised” Intercity Transit for requiring the employee to report attendance and compliance at mandated EAP.  The arbitrator held that the terms of the labor contract provided an employee could only be mandated to have an EAP “assessment,” but that Intercity Transit could not require “treatment”, compliance or attendance reports from the EAP provider.  The arbitrator’s award thus vacated a long-standing protocol for mandated EAP services.

Ed showed a short Power Point presentation that had been used to advise supervisors of the arbitration Award.  The goal was to “de-mystify” the hard realities of the Award and use the event as a learning tool.  Excerpts from arbitration Award had been used to remind supervisors the value of conducting thorough investigations of potential disciplinary circumstance and maintaining good documentation.  A redacted copy of the Award was distributed to the roundtable participants.

Conducting Current Employee Background and Driver Abstract Checks
The HR Roundtable members had a discussion regarding how often each agency does criminal background checks on its current employees.  Agencies that do background checks on current employees such as Mason, and C-TRAN, do the checks every other year.  C-TRAN has a requirement in their personnel policy stating employees must report arrests.

Tracey Christianson of WSTIP said that the cost for driver abstracts through WSTIP has increased from $5 to $10 per abstract.

Kristen Anger, of Summit Law, then joined the group via speaker phone for a brief question and answer period.  Questions revolved around deferments of DUI convictions, and there were also questions about whether or not a clause can be included in your personnel policy requiring employees to report arrests that have a nexus to their job.  A discussion ensued about the need to negotiate with the unions if such a clause was included in the personnel policy.

Legislative Update – Impact on Human Resources
Peter Thein of WSTA updated the HR Roundtable participants regarding recent legislation.

E2SSB 5669 Establishing Family Leave and Medical Leave Insurance was passed.  The law goes into effect on October 1, 2009.  The law requires that benefits of $250 per week for up to five weeks are paid to employees who are unable to work because they are on leave for the birth of a child or the placement of a child for adoption.  Currently this leave benefit program is not funded; the legislature is looking into funding possibilities.

SB 5037 regarding hands free phone use goes into effect on July 1, 2008.  An exemption is being sought for transit agencies.

HB 2216 requiring having a non voting union representative on PTBA boards did not pass.

SSB 5340 This bill was passed, and significantly expands the definition of disability under Washington law.   The bill states that a disability exists if it is perceived to exist.  Peter will ask Michelle Parvinen of WSTA to send each HR Roundtable participant a summary of this bill.

Labor Updates
Ed Ruttledge, Intercity Transit.
Ed told the group that a new ATU local split off from Local #1384.  The new Local is #1765, and is made up of Intercity Transit, Grays Harbor, and Pacific Transit. Kitsap Transit is currently the sole remaining group in the Local #1384.  Twin Transit decertified earlier this year from the Local #1384.

The IAM contract expired December 2006.  After attempts at mediation and a membership vote were unsuccessful negotiations for the IAM contract are going to interest arbitration.  Some outstanding issues include wages, comp time and the “want” of longevity pay.  The preliminary Arb process has just begun.  Update: it appears the IAM arbitration will be in November 2007.

The ATU contract was settled in May 2006 and retroactive back to January 2006.  The term of the agreement is 2006-2008.

Kimberly Somers, Whatcom Transit.
The ATU union membership has not accepted the contract yet.  Some of the issues to be resolved are cameras on the bus and combining part-time/full-time work in Paratransit. 

Whatcom has also been experiencing a high number of grievances.

Louisa Hernandez, Ben Franklin Transit
The ATU and Teamsters contracts are being negotiated.  The contracts expired May 31st.  (The Teamsters represent ParaTransit.)  Ben Franklin’s IAM contract does not expire for 1 ½ years.

Tina Guzinski, Community Transit
The IAM contract expired last year.  The main issues are cost of medical premiums and a salary increase for 30 IAM supervisors.

Arlene Doern, C-TRAN.
Currently in negotiations with three ATU contracts:  the operators’ contract expired August 31st, the ParaTransit contract expired at the end of May, and the clerical contract expired at the end of April.

Jean White, Pierce Transit
A professional recruiting agency has been retained to fill the open position of Vice President of Human Resources.  Ruth Moore, Senior HR Analyst had also retired.  Jean has promoted to this position and recruitments are underway for an HR Analyst.

Chris Baldini, Spokane Transit.
The ATU contract expires September 30th.  Spokane hired Bruce Schroeder for upcoming interest arbitration with AFSCME.

Jenny Huff, Mason Transit
Mason Transit is a non union environment.  The benefits package has changed.  They no longer have medical benefits through the Washington State Health Care Authority.  They now have medical insurance through the Washington Counties Insurance Fund with composite rates at a substantial savings.

Mary Lozeau, Skagit Transit
The Operators contract (not ATU) expired in December.  The mechanics are exploring organizing with IAM.

Tracey Christianson, WSTIP
Tracey reminded everyone to be sure they update/add/delete their agencies information (policy, contracts, forms, etc) stored on the WSTIP website.  You can access this site by going into WSTIP, then log on as “transit”, then go to top and click on “transit policies”.  Once there you can “browse” (left hand side column) documents.  Be sure to check what’s listed under your agency’s site. Thanks!

Mary Adams, Lane Transit
The Oregon legislature is in session now.  Lane Transit’s ATU contract expires June 30th.  The main issues are retirement and economic issues.

Next Meeting:  The members decided to not hold a committee meeting at the upcoming WA ST DOT Conference this August in Vancouver.  Lane Transit, in Eugene, Oregon, has volunteered to host the next meeting.  Meeting to be held in fall of this year.  Exact date and time to be announced.

There was a discussion about possible agenda items for the next meeting; NEOGOV has asked for time at an upcoming meeting to do a longer presentation of their product but Roundtable members determined they are not interested at this time in any further information.  Other agenda items included 1) recruitment; what does each transit do to attract more applicants in general, and specifically how to attract more minority applicants,

2) Jenny Huff @ Shelton Transit had something??, 3) Succession Planning?? and . . .

 PLS NOTE:  If you have ideas for future agenda items, pls. forward them to Lane Transit as they will be hosting the next meeting.  Suggestion – start a “parking lot” of ideas - added /delete at our meetings.

 

Prepared by Susan @ Intercity Transit 6/28/07

 

 

WSTA staff is happy to provide information and answer questions.

(360) 786-9734 ~  Fax (360) 786-9740
2629 12th Court SW  ~  Olympia, WA 98502-1118